CWG+Notes+2-8

February 8 at 1:30 Carrie Kornely, Sandi Hausmann, Jenny Schmitz, Jody Burger, Ruth Nelsen Kia Martinson, Kara Buechle, Katie Sayler, Teacher Toby, Chris Yellow Boy *Facilitator: Carrie *Time Keeper: Jenny *Recorder: Jody *Process Observer: Ruth *Task Master: Sandi // Use most recent Aims Web data at every grade level to identify patterns, design and implement instruction in order to improve student literacy in grades K-3. // __Letter Naming Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will identify 61+ letter names as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.
 * __ Date & Time __**
 * __ Present Members __**
 * __ Absent Members __**
 * __ Jobs __**
 * __ School Goal __**
 * __ Grade Level Goal(s) __**

__Letter Sound Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will identify and produce 44+ letter sounds as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__Phoneme Segmentation Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will successfully segment 52+ phonemes as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__Nonsense Word Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will produce 62+ letter sounds when given a Nonsense Word, as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__ORF__
 * By May, 2011 80% of North Elementary First grade students will read 61+ words per minute when reading a first grade passage as measured by the AIMSWeb assessment.

*By May, 2011, 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will meet the A (apply) level finding the parts to ten without counters as measured by the Kathy Richardson Hiding Assessment. *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will offer a proficient explanation of their work as measured by the Rubric for Assessing Language.
 * __Math__**


 * Prior Session:**
 * We discussed and came up with a plan to distribute Dynamite Bucks.**
 * (last math session) Looked at Hiding Assessment data and discussed what was being done in the classroom to reach the goal. Reassess the week of Feb. 7 and have data ready by Feb. 15. We also discussed the language of math and how to get students to think about the equation they are writing: Do a think aloud for a math problem. (There are 2 on the table and 4 in the cup. The total is 6)**
 * (last literacy session) Discussed AIMSweb data versus DIBELS data. Suggestion was to rotate teachers to test others' kids. Also found a fluency assessment to use. Jody is making copies of the ORF, new NWF assessments. Will finish discussion on Wednesday. Jody shared __www.wordway.us.com/FamilySets.pdf__**


 * Today's Purpose:**
 * Design a Math SMART goal addressing the language we need our first graders to use when problem solving.
 * How will we assess this goal?

Today, we looked at the rubric Chris made for use to help us assess the language students use in math. He had the Proficient and Advanced parts done and we sat down and gave our input to make rubrics for Below Basic and Basic columns. We were all in agreement with what we have. We had a discussion on what this looks like and what we expect from them. We need to model, model, model.

Next week we are going to explain and model this for our students. We will begin to practice, practice, practice.

We changed our SMART goals for math. We need to work on this for the end of the year.

We are all committed to modeling the new rubric and getting out hiding assessments done.