CWG+Notes+1-25

__ First Grade CWG Meeting __ January 25 at 1:30 Jody Burger, Carrie Kornely, Sandi Hausmann, Kia Martinson, Jenny Schmitz, Ruth Nelson, Chris Yellow Boy, Toby Godoy Katie, Kara Buechle *Facilitator: Jenny // Use most recent Aims Web data at every grade level to identify patterns, design and implement instruction in order to improve student literacy in grades K-3. // __Letter Naming Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will identify 61+ letter names as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.
 * __ Date & Time __**
 * __ Present Members __**
 * __ Absent Members __**
 * __ Jobs __**
 * Time Keeper: Jody
 * Recorder: Kia
 * Process Observer: Sandi
 * Task Master: Carrie
 * __ School Goal __**
 * __ Grade Level Goal(s) __**

__Letter Sound Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will identify and produce 44+ letter sounds as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__Phoneme Segmentation Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will successfully segment 52+ phonemes as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__Nonsense Word Fluency__ *By May, 2011 80% of the North Elementary First grade students will produce 62+ letter sounds when given a Nonsense Word, as measured by the AIMS Webb assessment.

__ORF__
 * By May, 2011 80% of North Elementary First grade students will read 61+ words per minute when reading a first grade passage as measured by the AIMSWeb assessment.

*By the end of January, 2011, all students will meet the practice level finding the parts to seven as measured by the Kathy Richardson Hiding Assessment.
 * __Math__**
 * By the end of January, 2011, all students will meet the A (apply) level finding the parts to five as measured by the Kathy Richardson Hiding Assessment.


 * Prior Session:**
 * Games for Parent Night/ Conferences:**
 * How-to Books/Labels - put in order and make a picture**
 * Beans in a Cup**

KR Hiding Assessment Data.
 * Today's Purpose:**
 * How many reached the goal of A for parts of 5?
 * How many reached the goal of P for parts of 7?


 * Where do we go from here?
 * Write new SMART goals for math.

Discussion: The kids that haven't met the apply level for 5 wants to count-on... instead of being automatic

(P)Parts of 7: Jodi 15% Sandi 25% Carrie 53% Kia 94% Jenny 56% What are we going to do to get these kids up to benchmark? Sandi does KR activities during 10 min. math. Uses dot cards and equation sheets to write down the dot addition. We shared activites what we're doing during Math time to get kids to become automatic. Writing the equations doesn't make them "think" about what they are writing. What are they thinking while writing the equations? Have a conversation with them.. Think aloud while they write. Have them describe what they did. We should be hearing that language when we walk around, if not, sit down with them and model it and how it sounds.


 * Reassess in 3 weeks, (Feb. 7) (have data ready by the 15th) the kids that have NOT met benchmark.

Next week Math: Share another KR activity that works well in our room.

Do we want them to clearly articulate the strategy they use? What kind of vocabulary...? (I counted on 7 more from three) Re-write Smart Goals: Create a measurable rubric that they can share the language/vocab of the strategy they use.
 * Come with ideas on what students will need to articulate during the measurement unit.
 * Bring Pacing Guides.

Closing: We are committed to help students articulate the strategies that they are using. We will meet in Sandi's room tomorrow.


 * Housekeeping:**
 * Early dismissal at 3pm on Thursday January 27, for Parent Teacher Conferences**
 * No School on Friday Jan. 28 for PT Conferences**